Commuity Expansion and the Governmental policies of Creation Intervention in Nigeria: Issues and Growing Perspectives
Community Development and the Politics of Advancement Intervention in Nigeria: Issues and Rising Perspectives
John M. Tanker Ph. Deb [email protected] com 08055315449 Division of Mature and Non-Formal Education University or college of Slot Harcourt
Being a Newspaper Presented in the First Nationwide Conference of Community Expansion Practitioners in Nigeria Placed at University of Ibadan on 27-29 August, 2012.
Community Development and the Politics of Development Treatment in Nigeria: Issues and Emerging Points of views
The Nigerian federal government involvement in community expansion is often viewed as development intervention to complete the development gap in the region. The engagement of the federal government in community development is usually not new it can be tracked to colonial area and over the years it includes taken diverse dimensions- via national advancement plans towards the use of advancement agencies. This kind of paper records the engagement of the govt in community development from your colonial period to post impartial period and argued that community development through creation intervention has become political and that at different times community development hard work of the government is certainly not out of the legitimate aspiration with the people alternatively it is geared towards meeting the exigencies of that time period and the demands of the political class. Because of these underlining aims of government development intervention programmes for community development, the avowed community development guidelines are not taken into cognizance and the programs also shortage measures of sustainability. Keywords and phrases: Development Input, Bottom-up, Top-down, Community Advancement.
Community development within a certain feeling is not new to people in Nigeria. Okeem (1982) pointed out that it is usually argued that it must be rooted into the extended relatives structure mainly because self support projects are undertaken through some form of shared assistance. According to Okem community advancement processes in traditional Yoruba society got the form of aaro or perhaps owe a practice were partners work with each other to ensure that their output may be speedy and substantive and the individual that called for the work provides meals for the people who perform the task. In the South East Nigeria, Ojike as mentioned by Okeem give an account of how adult men gather in town square to fix public highways, how girls took care of streams and clear away market stalls; and how the boys sweep public locations such as market, idol houses and playgrounds. This kind of community development may be likened to natural order by which each living subject or community of living objects brought about their own creation using their own effort and resources. The statutory form of community expansion in the form of advancement intervention began during the colonial time era; and ever since community development offers taken distinct dimension with varying plan issues and various stakeholders including federal, condition and local authorities as well as International Corporations, creation agencies and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). The issue is whether precisely what is done by the us government as advancement intervention can be community advancement a bottom-up or top-down community advancement. This newspaper in the light of the policy development examines the growing perspectives and issues in Nigeria. The paper remnants the practice of community development through development intervention in Nigeria right from the colonial time to the content independent period.
Defining Community Development and Development Treatment...
References: Aaron, K. E. (2012). The Nature and State of Local Government in Nigeria. Port Harcourt: Kemuela.
Ake, C. (1983). A Politics Economy of Africa. Greater london: Longman.
Dish, M. (2011). Communities of practice, complying or level of resistance? Regional sites in the mature and community education sector in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Community Expansion. 46 S2 ii83-ii96.
Checkoway, M. (2011). Community development, social diversity, and the metropolis. Log Community Creation 46(S2) ii5-ii14.
Dhamotharan, Meters. G. (2009). Handbook in Integrated Community Development- Several D Approach to community Ability Development. Tokyo: Asian Production Organisation
Ekumankama, D. U. (1996). The Law and Advancement Local Government in Nigeria. Enugu: Ika Christian Press.
Elaigwu, J. My spouse and i. (1988). Government authorities and Community Development Programmes. In Amechi, N. (ed) Perspectives in Community and Rural Advancement in Nigeria. Jos: Middle for Development Studies College or university of Jos.
Gajanayake, S i9000. & Gajanayake, J. (1993). Community Personal strength: A Participatory Training Manual on Community Project Creation. New York: Pact Publishers.
Desire, A, & Timmel, S i9000 (2003). Practicing Transformation: A Handbook pertaining to Community Employees. Gweru: Mambo Press
Steve, V. (2006). Community expansion research: merging(or submerging) areas of practice? A response to Van Vlaenderen. Journal of Community Advancement 41 1 50-64
Meade, 3rd there’s r. & Shaw, M. (2007) Community creation and the disciplines: reviving the democratic thoughts. Journal of Community Creation, 42 (4) 413-421
Okeem, E. U. (1982). Mature Education in Ghana & Tanzania 1945-75. Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press.
Onimode, B. (1981) Planning for Underdevelopment in Nigeria. In Nnoli, O. (ed) Path to Nigerian Development. Dakar: Codesria.
Pearce, J., Howard, J., & Bronstein, A. (2010). Learning from Latin America. Journal of Community Developpment. 45 (3), 265-275.
Titterton, M. & Smart, H. (2008). May participatory exploration be a route to empowerment? An instance study of your disadvantaged Scottish community. Journal of Community Development. 43(1)52-64